Home
Up

 

P.S. 101 School Leadership Team (2009-2010)

MINUTES
 

SLT Minutes Sept 16, 2009

SLT Minutes Oct 6, 2009

SLT Minutes Oct 27, 2009

SLT Minutes Nov 17, 2009

SLT Minutes Dec 1, 2009

SLT Minutes Jan 5, 2010

SLT Minutes March 9, 2010

SLT Minutes April 13, 2010

SLT Minutes April 27, 2010

SLT Minutes May 4, 2010

 

                        

                 


   

P.S. 101 School Leadership Team (2009-2010)

Meeting Minutes

October 27, 2009

I.    Call to order

Deb Dillingham (Current Chair of the SLT) called to order the regular meeting of the P.S. 101 School Leadership Team at 2:15 on October 27th, 2009 at P.S. 101.

II. Review/Approval of Minutes:

The October 6th, 2009 minutes were reviewed and approved by SLT members.

III. Attendance

The following persons were present:

P.S. 101 Staff P.S. 101 Parents
Valerie Capitulo-Saide (Principal, IA) Deb Dillingham (P.A. President)
Ronnie Feder (Principal) Nancy Northrop (Parent-member)
Rhonda Corin (UFT Representative) Ann Kittredge (Parent-member)
Michelle Trinchese (ICT Teacher) Marcia Parness (Parent-member)
Mary Lou Steincke (G&T Teacher) Jodi Freed (Parent-member)
Melissa Sawicki-Mallien (Art) Aram Arkun (Parent-member)
Jason Westerlund (5th Grade)  
   
Invited Guest Observers:
Irtis Gonzalez (Assistant Principal)
 

IV. Introduction of New Principal Valerie Capitulo-Saide and CEP update

SLT members reviewed the CEP draft. The Goals and Objectives were handed out. The draft is due October 30th, 2009. The PPR was submitted with these goals. Any suggested changes to the Goals and Objectives can be given to Assistant Principal Irtis Gonzalez or Principal, IA Valerie Capitulo-Saide. The CEP will be reviewed by the state. The narrative of the CEP will be updated. Various staff members are adjusting their components: ELL will be updated by ELL teacher, Michelle Rao, the Special Education component will be updated by IEP teacher, Nicole Scotton, Science component will be updated by Science cluster teacher, Denise Hyman and Social Studies component will be updated by Social Studies cluster teacher, Jeff Moss.

V.  Parent Association Updates

Halloween party did better this year than previous year. Five teachers attended. The next event will be Autumn Lights on November 8, 2009.

VI. Fact Finding Survey

The subcommittee members for the interim parent survey are Jay Westerlund, Mary Lou Steincke, Marcia Parness, and Jodi Freed. The survey will target the 4 most troublesome areas. The dual questions can be separated out on this survey. Ideas and questions can be emailed to Jay and Mary Lou. Jodi and Marcia will create the survey. The incentive will be a pizza party for the class that brings back 100% of the surveys the fastest.

Survey questions will be based on the 2009 parent survey. We need to find out what we can do to improve. There will be a comment section to write suggestions for improvement.


Question 1: How often during the school year have you received information about what your child is studying in school?
Question 2: How often during the school year have you received information on services for your child or for you, such as tutoring, after school programs, or workshops you can attend to help your child?

Statement 1: The school contacts me to tell me about my child’s achievements and successes.

Statement 2: The school has high expectations for my child.

VII. Summary and Review of Science and Social Studies State Tests

A. Fourth Grade Science Test

Eighty-five students were tested. Of the 85 students tested, 92% received a 3 or a 4. Of the remaining 8%, 4% received a level 2 and 4% received a level 1. This 8% consisted of IEP, CTT and self-contained students.

Science weaknesses:

1. Students struggle with vocabulary
2. Students had difficulty using a scale and ruler
3. Students had trouble following the written directions independently

To help students improve, cluster and classroom teachers articulate monthly to address key vocabulary.

These science weaknesses should be articulated to next year’s teachers and for teachers of the students in upcoming classes.

SLT members suggested that the newsletters need to send these items home to parents in a “Helpful Hints to Parents” section. Currently, there should be a vocabulary section under each content area to help parents.

B. Fifth Grade Social Studies Test

100% of the students tested passed with a level 3 or 4. Forty-four of the 57 students received a 4. Thirteen of the students received a level 3. This is a two day test with three parts. There is a multiple choice part and document based essays. The information on this test is derived from Grade 3 and Grade 4 content and skills. The tests are marked “in-house.” Much of the information is provided on the test through various documents.

In October, there was a parent workshop concerning the Social Studies test at which, Assistant Principal Capitulo, all fifth grade classroom teachers, and Mr. Moss showed parents the format of the exam and gave helpful hints for parents to assist their children at home.


VIII. Summary and Review of ELA State Tests

A. Third grade ELA test

It appears the most troublesome questions have the wording “most important” and ”most likely” in the question. The strategy is for the students to pick out and determine what is the most important detail. They also need to read ALL of the questions first and then choose. For many of the questions the students scored poorly on, had the answer as choice “D”. Suggesting students are not reading through answers and picking the first one they read that sounds right. Students also need to be able to make predictions, draw conclusions, and make inferences about events and characters. (Third grade test scores are translated to fourth grade teachers.)


B. Fourth grade ELA test

Students need to use specific evidence from stories to identify themes; describe characters, their actions, and their motivations. Students also need to be able to relate a sequence of events. For the extended responses they are scored according to a 4 point rubric. The average score was a 2.8. The students needed to go back to the story and complete the chart using details. They need to take good notes on what is important and then use these notes to construct their answers. The average score for the other writing item was a 2.6. Students needed to listen to a passage and then use details from the story to support their answer. To help with these areas, teachers need to expose the children to more listening passages in the classroom. The first time the students should just listen. Upon the second reading, students should take notes. .
 

C. Fifth Grade ELA test

Students need to use process of elimination. The students are allowed and encouraged to write in the test book and mark the passage. There was a passage requiring students to distinguish between a folktale and a fable, they should know characteristics of genres. Many questions require the students to read between the lines and determine what is implied and not stated. They should be able to read nonfiction articles in order to read and interpret data and ideas.

D. Sixth Grade ELA test

The troublesome passages were primarily non-fiction. Students had to use context clues, a dictionary, or a glossary to determine unfamiliar words. Students needed to identify missing, conflicting, unclear and irrelevant information. They also needed to identify information that is implied rather than stated. Questions asking for answers that were “most likely” require evaluation and prediction.

We had included non-fiction as one of our goals but were asked to broaden the goal. One of the Action Plans are specific to non-fiction. The Scantron tests will also isolate non-fiction.

To address these issues teachers should pair more nonfiction and fiction texts. Test prep is also beneficial for students who test poorly.

IX. Summary and Review of Math State Tests

A. Third Grade

The highest percentage of incorrect responses were in symmetry (geometry). Students also needed to show all work. If students do not show all of their work they cannot get full credit. Number Sense and Operations as well as Measurement were other areas of concern

B. Fourth Grade

Again Number Sense and Operation was an area of difficulty. Statistics and Probability was the second highest incorrect category.

C. Fifth Grade

Students had difficulty with reading, writing and ordering decimals to thousands; formulating conclusions and making predictions from graphs; and classifying quadrilaterals by properties of their angles and sides.

D. Sixth Grade

Students had difficulty identifying radius, diameter, chords, and central angles of a triangle. Students also had difficulty defining and identifying commutative and associative properties of addition and multiplication. Problems involving percent, rate and base were also among the hardest.

X. Review of Updated Goals/Action Plan

SLT members reviewed Goals and Objectives Template.

Goal Number 1: To improve Literacy Instruction Across All Grades. To improve literacy instruction by an average of 90 points as measured by the Scantron assessments administered three times during the school year.
The Scantron tops out at an 8th grade level. Some students are already at the cap. This goal needs to include all students including students with IEPs and in self-contained classes. This is considered a realistic goal.

Goal Number 2: To Strengthen Ability to Analyze and Use Data to Differentiate Instruction. It was noted that accommodations need to be noted for clusters because IEP modifications should be available across all subject areas.

Goal Number 3: To Strengthen Home Communication
Improving relationships foster communication. We have a Parent Association but not a Parent Teacher Association.

Goal Number 4: To further increase the number of teachers participating in Collaborative Inquiry Work. It is a city mandate that by June 2010, 90% of teachers participate in Collaborative Inquiry Work.


XI. SLT Subcommittees

SLT members will look at CEP and Action Plan and decide how we can create subcommittees. This will be tabled for next meeting. SLT members will brainstorm some possible subcommittees, prior to the next meeting.

XII. Academic Planners

There is still time to order agendas for students interested. These planners help children keep track of daily, weekly, and monthly assignments.

XIII. Agenda Items for Next Meeting:

a) School progress report (discussion of student and teacher portions)
b) Formation of SLT subcommittees

XIV. Adjournment

Meeting was adjourned at 4:15 PM.
Minutes submitted by: Michelle Trinchese
October 6th Minutes approved by: Members of SLT